Feng Yuanzheng on AI in Theater: Technology Cannot Replace the Human Soul in Art

As artificial intelligence continues to make inroads into the creative industries, the debate over its role in the arts has intensified. Feng Yuanzheng, a prominent figure in Chinese theater and a leader at the Beijing People’s Art Theatre, recently addressed these concerns, asserting that the stage is not currently a place for AI. He maintains a firm stance that while technology is a useful tool, it cannot and should not dominate the artistic process.

Feng’s perspective is echoed by other academic leaders in the arts, such as Hu Qiang, the president of the Beijing Film Academy. During discussions regarding the resurgence of classic dramas and films, Hu emphasized that while tools for creation are constantly evolving, the core of artistic resonance remains deeply rooted in human experience. According to Hu, the ability to empathize and convey complex emotional truths is a uniquely human trait that AI, regardless of its computational power, struggles to replicate.

This sentiment is particularly relevant in the context of acting. In professional film and theater, the performance of a human actor is considered irreplaceable when the goal is to communicate deep themes and genuine emotions to an audience. Critics of AI-generated content argue that art is fundamentally an act of communication between human beings—a shared experience of joy, sorrow, and existence. When technology is used to automate or synthesize these expressions, the ‘soul’ of the work is often lost, leaving behind a polished but hollow product.

Furthermore, the discussion touches upon the cyclical nature of aesthetics. As older works find new life with younger generations, it serves as a reminder that great art is timeless because it speaks to the human condition. Whether it is a classic television series finding a new audience or a stage play that has been performed for decades, the enduring appeal lies in the human connection. As the industry navigates the integration of new technologies, the consensus among these veteran artists is clear: innovation should serve the artist, not replace the human heart that gives art its meaning.

Sources: 21st Century Business Herald

Aggregated summary. Original: 21财经